-
Old news, perhaps, but the Democratic Leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi, issued a six-point plan last week to guide the party in the 2006 elections. Here's their plan. Really.
Translation: Take the drug companies profits, which they would funnel back into research into new drugs, and instead spend the money on government boondoggles which we will call "research." I am willing to bet any amount of money that the first benefits of stem cell research will come from drug companies, not the federal government. There is nothing I can think of where government actions in fields where private industry was competing has ever produced more, faster or better results than the private efforts.
Translation: Take profits from oil companies (I'm sensing a pattern), increase their direct costs (and bash them some more for raising prices) and use the money tobuy off our constituentsinflate demandhelp po' folk and fund more useless government boondoggles which we will also call "research."Drilling for oil in the 30-year proven supply that is off our coast and in the Arctic is completely off the table, of course, as is nuclear. Instead, we'll pander to the corn growers, pass endless unneeded regulations, close down more American production, and spend billions on research Toyota did better 5 years ago.
Translation: Screw the developing world, pander to unions, and drive marginal workers onto the dole. Because we're nice guys.Given that the unemployment rate is about as low as it ever gets, why in the world is anyone worried about people in India having jobs, too?
Without coming here?
Are we really so self-centered that we'll let trained brown people starve just so Billy-Bob Witless who dropped out of kindergarten can have a high-paying assembly job? It would be stupid if it wasn't so calculatingly cruel.
Um, maybe except the last: College loans are under prime rate as it is, and are a darn sight more risky. Cutting the rate to 3% will simply ensure that they are paid back as slowly as possible.
A rare triple oxymoron.
Which didn't happen until you lot went into opposition. Different day, different earmarks; the real problem here is at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. What we need is a fiscally conservative Republican in the White House who will veto overspending instead of proposing it.