-
Well, not in so many words, but the FTC urges ISPs to block all email that doesn't go through their servers. The idea is to prevent robo-spam, but it will also prevent anyone who has a private domain hosted elsewhere from using their domain's servers to send email. Worse, this stopgap suggestion, known as Port 25 blocking, will prevent any workable resolution of the spam problem, such as SPF or Sender ID. The FTC's advisors are clearly technical incompetents and should be fired.
What is required to solve the problem is twofold:
So what I do now would be impossible, I take it? I have a domain, use domain addresses, but use SBC DSL as the conduit.
Posted by: Ith at May 25, 2005 04:42 PMMy broadband ISP already did this to me a year ago. No notice, just all of a sudden I couldn't get through to my domain mail server's port 25. They told me if I got their more-costly "commercial" service, I could have access restored. Bloodsucking pig stickers.
Posted by: John Jorsett at May 28, 2005 11:06 AMSome web hosts offer a way around this, opening ANOTHER port number for SMTP (sending mail). Interocitor's ISP opens Port 26, for example. Most mail programs can be changed to use a different port on an account-by-account basis.
Posted by: Kevin Murphy at May 28, 2005 02:12 PM