The New York Times has a front page article tomorrow discussing an argument in the gay community about whether gay rights were pushed too fast in the last few years. Yet nowhere in the article does it even suggest that the mistake was pushing through the courts rather than through legislatures, or that the backlash ballot items had more to do with preempting activist courts rather than complete hostility to gay rights.
They (NYT) got the point. They are throwing out a Red Herring. Obfuscation is the object. The NYT rarely seeks clarity and this is a great example of making the water muddy.
Rod Stanton
Cerritos